Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Indo-European is not an actual linguistic language family
Ra Linguist

Date:
Indo-European is not an actual linguistic language family
Permalink   
 


Indo-European is not an actual lnguistic family...which means it's propaganda for something very sad.

I wonder if somone thinks that fools Polynesians



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Date:
Permalink   
 

I seem to recall a translation of texts and that the so called language family was originally called "Indo-Aryan" which is also called Indo-Iranian, which is in "Asia" where Austronesian history surrounds.

There is no more Altaic..which means it's some where along the lines of Austro-Asiatic

 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

Well the thing is..why now..I mean why now would people do this. Theres been some struggle now and then in the academic world, trying to get rid of those who seek to just oppress education.

This would only mean that people will now not value anything that comes out of the english speaking people.

According to Wikipedia..Indo-Iranian is a sub family of Indo-European..That pretty much erases the entire history of Rome and Persia, Persia and Greece, Persia and The Mongol Empire, and the Mongol Hun Empire..and it also means that all of India started in Europe. I mean come on...how in the hell can countries and regions 7,000-30,000 times younger be the "parent" or origin.

Thats like saying the Great Great Great Great Grand parent learned walking from his Great Great Great Great Grand child.

  



__________________
Anus eroman

Date:
Permalink   
 

English isn't even a Language.

Let me just put this better...The language that most of America speaks..is not really English. Meaning the label of the language is wrong. A more academic name for the language that Americans speak is Mani Lingua meaning; Many Languages.

The entire medical dictionary are Latin variatiions, a quater of it is mixed french, and french is mixed Spanish [theres historical reasons for this- WAR]

Spain is mixed Persian- Iranian, anyone who can do word history can trace almost all words back to about east Germany and west asia, or south tipping Northern Africa and Spain.

  



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   
 

October 1st: Wikipage: Indo-Aryan

Indo-Aryan is an ethno-linguistic term referring to the wide collection of peoples united as native speakers of the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-Iranian family of Indo-European languages. Today, there are over one billion native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages, most of them native to South Asia, where they form the majority.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryans

It finally admits that the native speakers are South asian, you just have to go through about 30 wikipages depending on where you start, before it finally spits out some educational information. I notice that almost each page in the subject of Indo-European on Wikipedia, talks about everything except the actualy history of it, even attempts to break down "y" sounds and with no specific language study. It's like talking about the surface of a desk in 20 ways.

South Asia, Southeast Asia: Austronesian - Sanskrit [Malayo-Polynesian & Polynesian Pre-History]

On the top right of each wikipage theres a link saying "History". Means the history of each Wikipedia page. You can always see how each page started out, and it's really funny how the history changes.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard